|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The following interview was broadcast by
the Australian radio channel ABC, following a talk given by
Rebecca Swift at the Melbourne Literary Festival 1999.
Jill Kitson: Auberon
Waugh, Editor of the monthly Literary Review in London, has
said, ‘The best advice to anyone wishing to write a novel
is “Don’t do it.” The second best advice is
“Send it to the Literary Consultancy.”
Welcome to Lingua Franca. I’m Jill
Kitson. This week: Can I write? Rebecca Swift of The Literary
Consultancy on the critical service TLC provides to unpublished
writers.
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Rebecca Swift: Obviously
99% of our job is to give detailed, constructive critiques with
a market assessment that is honest. I’m absolutely not
interested in misleading anybody, you know, it seems to me that
that’s bordering on the criminal, to continue to take
money and lead people to believe there is a market.
Jill Kitson: It
used to be said that everyone has a novel in them. These days
it seems nearly everyone has written a novel, or a memoir, or a
family biography or a collection of short stories. Now they
want to see their manuscript inside a jacket and on sale in the
bookshops. If they simply bundle it up and send it to a
publisher, it’s 99% sure to end up on the slush pile.
Eventually it may come back to the author with a rejection
slip. Does it mean the author cannot write?
At the recent Melbourne Writers’
Festival, Rebecca Swift explained how and why she came to set
up The Literary Consultancy for unpublished writers.
Rebecca Swift: While
I was working at Virago, I was on what they called the slush
pile which was my introduction really to that incredible world
of people who are writing, whose destiny is usually never to
get published. And I found the numbers completely overwhelming.
There’s just too much work being written to be published
and too many people I think now thinking they will be published
with no particularly good reason, which is a very harsh thing
to say, but it’s something that I’ve learnt along
the way as I’ve struggled with my own writing – and
I’ve now squeezed through some very strange things, like
librettos about the Buddha, and nothing particularly
commercial. But I am beginning to realise what I can and
can’t do as a writer, and it’s an interesting
process and it’s a critical process if you’re going
to be serious about writing. It’s very important.
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Anyway, to get back to how TLC started:
people would ring up and they would talk to me about the
editorial process and would describe their book. And I would
say, ‘Well that doesn’t sound like it’s a
Virago book.’ Maybe it was about gardening, it was by a
man and it was about gardening. So I’d say, ‘Well
a) we’re a feminist press and b) we don’t do books
on gardens.’ And he’d say, ‘Oh, but
won’t you just have a look?’ And I’d say,
‘Well, I don’t think so.’ And he’d be
getting more and more frustrated, and he’d say,
‘Well look, isn’t there anywhere I can just send
this for an opinion?’ And I’d go, ‘Oh, um, I
don’t think there is really. No, I’m really sorry
about that.’ But I really couldn’t think of
anything to suggest. And it just began to click that what a lot
of the people ringing in wanted was a professional response,
and when they began to say they’d be prepared to pay
something for that response and I still couldn’t think of
anywhere to send them, I began to think this is crazy;
everybody’s plying publishers and agents with their work,
very inappropriately, and certainly it would be possible to
have some kind of consultancy to professionalise the system
whereby people got work assessed before they approached
publishers and agents, in order to check out whether their work
is working, how it will be received by editors and publishers,
in a very honest way. Because the other thing that’s
clear to me is that when people send work in to publishers,
they incredibly rarely get an honest answer. I mean usually
they get one or two lines of rebuffal. We were told for example
to say, ‘Sorry, but our list is full’; if the
writer looked like they could string sentences together, we
would say, ‘You can write, but our list is full.’
One story that really shocked me was two
years after a woman had received one of these standard cards,
she rang in sounding very tremulous and she said that
she’d just thrown the novel in the cupboard two years ago
in disgust, having received the standard card, had recently
gone back to the cupboard, picked it out of the cupboard,
turned the card over and seen, ‘PS: You can write but our
list is full.’ Did this mean she could write?
Now this is two years after asking a
completely different editorial assistant, and the desperation
in her voice just really touched me because it was something
that I identified with. I mean, when you are struggling, that
seems the big question, you know, Can I write? It’s an
interesting question, I don’t even quite know what it
means. Everybody can write, but can you do that thing that
turns people on enough to say ‘This is also touching me,
and maybe there will be a market.’
So it was a series of incidents like this,
and I began to think ‘Oh, goodness me, you know, these
are the people that I really want to be working with and
thinking about. So when in fact Virago went through a major
shift and made almost everybody in it redundant, I was given
– not a golden handshake, a kind of copper handshake. I
was given enough to live very modestly for a period of time
without going into the Debtors’ Prison or wherever. And
in that time I thought, ‘Well what will always happen is
people will always write, and they will always struggle to
write, with or without the market doing what it wants them to
do. That’s for sure.’ What I mean is, even if the
market got to the point that it said you know, ‘We will
only publish 20-year-old people who are particularly
beautiful’ it still wouldn’t stop the rest of the
world from writing, and neither should it. And I think
it’s a good thing that it wouldn’t.
But in the meantime, the sensible thing
seemed to be to try to put into process the sort of
long-harboured fantasy of The Literary Consultancy, and with a
friend called Hannah Griffiths who was a publicist at Virago,
and made redundant at the same time as me, she was absolutely
fabulous at saying, ‘Well Becky, just stop sitting around
and get up, and what are your leaflets going to look like, and
how are you going to charge, and how are you going to organise
this, and where are your readers going to come from, and what
are we going to pay them?’ And you know, the nuts and
bolts of how it would work. And so we sat and we talked and we
talked and we talked. And then the first TLC leaflet was
launched and we didn’t realise that TLC was TLC.
I’ve had cheques since made out to Tender Loving Care. It
is tender loving care as well, it’s a sort of caring way
of approaching people’s writing. But having said that
we’re quite honest as well. The people that we chose to
be readers were largely in the first place people working for
editors I knew from within publishing who were now freelancing
quite often, largely because they also were now – you
know, it seemed to me that a lot of the very good editors were
cut out of the main body of publishing in the late ‘80s,
and they were sort of swimming around with their talents
bemoaning the state of things. And it’s a lot of these
people that I targeted to be readers for the consultancy.
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|